NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Hull Royal Infirmary

Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Jose Amador Bunola Cerda3435977 H K
Sandeep Prakash Datir5203534 H K
Jacob Der Tavitian4248800 H K E S
Ganesh Devarajan4747691 H K A
Shivkumar Gopal4537980 H K
Sally Hobson4639538 E
Muhammad Ismail4725729 H E S
Geoffrey Verne Johnson2698403 H K
Viren Mishra4647045 H K A E
Elizabeth Helen Moulder4605784 H K
Nagarajan Muthukumar4467603 H K
Aamer Nisar5202353 H K S
Rajesh Ramaswamy4675752 H K
Niloy Roy4456588 K E S
Javed Salim4644688 H K
Rajesh Radhakrishna Shah4248989 H
Hemant Sharma4362519 H K
Christopher Shaw3089462 H K S
David Smart4338129 H K
Thomas Symes4616490 H K
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-44246
Hip Revision-1024
Knee Revision-718
Elbow Primary-Fewer Than 54
Elbow Revision-Fewer Than 53
Shoulder Primary-520
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 54
           Total66+319
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-116717
Hip Revision-1369
Knee Revision-1752
Elbow Primary-58
Elbow Revision-Fewer Than 54
Shoulder Primary-1154
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 58
           Total162+912
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreAs Expected18622.3522.74
EQ-5DAs Expected1710.4370.469
EQ-VASAs Expected16612.8714.41
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected11.001.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19As Expected2231.721.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected1771.551.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003, for Northern Ireland since 2013 and for the Isle of Man since 2015.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male25%40%
Under 60 years of age3%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)0%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)17%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis100%9%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem4400100%
Hip cup4400100%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreAs Expected18418.5517.33
EQ-5DAs Expected1670.3550.341
EQ-VASAs Expected1617.687.51
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19No Data Available--
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19No Data Available--
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19No Data Available--
 
ELBOWS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time elbow replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

Note: Data submission for Northern Ireland hospitals started in February 2013 and for the Isle of Man in July 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male44%30%
Under 60 years of age56%30%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)20%32%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis100%79%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

Note: Data submission for Northern Ireland hospitals started in February 2013 and for the Isle of Man in July 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male15%30%
Under 60 years of age15%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)23%30%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis100%45%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)Better Than Expected100.0%95.0%
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)Better Than Expected100.0%95.0%
ConsentAs Expected76.4%90.0%
Valid NHS numberAs Expected90.3%95.0%
Time taken to enter dataAs Expected17 Days30 Days
 
Window
If there is no profile for an individual surgeon it is likely to be because of concerns about the accuracy of the data originally supplied to the NJR and it has, therefore, been decided not to publish this surgeon's data.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2020 NJR