NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Nuffield Health Chichester Hospital

Nuffield Health
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Adam Ajis6048783 H A
Simon Cavanagh2525202 H K E S
Hugh Clarke2654607 H K
Edward John Christopher Dawe6143007 H A
Laurence Dodd6029178 H K
Richard Mark Fleming Hill3543449 H K E S
Samantha Hook4627584 H K
Bill (Andrew James Lund) Jowett4339560 H A
Andrew John Langdown4015886 H K
Michael Moss2803456 H K
Biyyam Madhusudhan Rao4596417 H K
Lee James Taylor2372318 H K
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-200246
Hip Revision-924
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement155243
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement4135
Knee Revision-1318
Ankle Primary-Fewer Than 56
Elbow Primary-Fewer Than 54
Shoulder Primary-2720
           Total445+596
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-615717
Hip Revision-2869
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement711
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement560703
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement12092
Knee Revision-3652
Ankle Primary-Fewer Than 512
Elbow Primary-Fewer Than 58
Shoulder Primary-7254
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 58
           Total1438+1726
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreNo Data Available--
EQ-5DNo Data Available--
EQ-VASNo Data Available--
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected9380.321.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19As Expected15950.831.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected9460.581.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003, for Northern Ireland since 2013 and for the Isle of Man since 2015.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male37%40%
Under 60 years of age14%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)6%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)7%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis2%9%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem18812094%
Hip cup19910100%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreAs Expected4517.3817.33
EQ-5DAs Expected400.3510.341
EQ-VASAs Expected346.697.51
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected10220.671.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19Worse Than Expected15321.831.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19Worse Than Expected10272.351.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. For Northern Ireland since 2013 and for the Isle of Man since 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male44%43%
Under 60 years of age14%17%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)13%23%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)8%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis0%3%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

Note: Data submission for Northern Ireland hospitals started in February 2013 and for the Isle of Man in July 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male36%30%
Under 60 years of age5%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)19%30%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis40%45%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
ConsentBetter Than Expected96.9%90.0%
Valid NHS numberAs Expected94.4%95.0%
Time taken to enter dataAs Expected15 Days30 Days
 
Window
If there is no profile for an individual surgeon it is likely to be because of concerns about the accuracy of the data originally supplied to the NJR and it has, therefore, been decided not to publish this surgeon's data.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2020 NJR