NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Benenden Hospital

Benenden Healthcare Society
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Hugh David Apthorp3359965 H K
Christopher Brooks2730705 E S
James Andrew Fownes Buchanan3166145 H K E S
Alex Chipperfield4448215 H K
William Dunnet3174315 H K
Richard Goddard4425926 H K
Philip Housden2942669 H K
Daniel William Flache Neen4628341 H E S
Matthew Oliver4521169 H K
Gaddam Kumar Reddy4354057 H K
Raj Kumar Shrivastava3375831 H K
Crispin Robert Southgate4329422 H K A
Hemant Thakral4564294 H K E S
Raman Raj Thakur4261371 H K
Omar Nicolas Yanni3320721 H K
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-281245
Hip Revision-Fewer Than 522
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement368242
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement2835
Knee Revision-Fewer Than 516
Shoulder Primary-520
           Total682+580
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-911715
Hip Revision-Fewer Than 563
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral ReplacementFewer Than 511
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement1088701
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement11591
Knee Revision-546
Shoulder Primary-2754
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 57
           Total2146+1688
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreAs Expected4222.7322.74
EQ-5DAs Expected400.5160.469
EQ-VASAs Expected3816.7514.41
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected13580.281.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19As Expected19191.081.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected13670.891.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003, for Northern Ireland since 2013 and for the Isle of Man since 2015.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male39%40%
Under 60 years of age13%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)11%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)5%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis1%9%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem28100100%
Hip cup2738097%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreAs Expected5918.4417.33
EQ-5DAs Expected580.3470.341
EQ-VASAs Expected547.717.51
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected17650.251.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19As Expected25310.691.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected17710.561.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. For Northern Ireland since 2013 and for the Isle of Man since 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male47%43%
Under 60 years of age11%17%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)19%23%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)6%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis1%3%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

Note: Data submission for Northern Ireland hospitals started in February 2013 and for the Isle of Man in July 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male23%30%
Under 60 years of age3%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)4%30%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis27%45%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
ConsentAs Expected82.3%90.0%
Valid NHS numberAs Expected94.6%95.0%
Time taken to enter dataBetter Than Expected8 Days30 Days
 
Window
If there is no profile for an individual surgeon it is likely to be because of concerns about the accuracy of the data originally supplied to the NJR and it has, therefore, been decided not to publish this surgeon's data.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2020 NJR