NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Leicester General Hospital

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Alwyn Abraham4342333 H E
Alison Louise Armstrong3070363 H K E S
Robert Ashford3678668 H K
Maneesh Bhatia5198567 H K A
Stuart John Birtwistle3293373 H K
Kevin Boyd3328808 H K
Andrew Brown3313325 H K
Urjit Chatterji4049324 H K
John Nicholas Sutton Davison3122552 H K
Joseph Dias3231551 S
Colin Esler3063792 H K
Arijit Ghosh6129987 H K
Steven Paul Godsiff2959807 H K
Steffan Hutchings4450874 H K
Muhammad Tawfiq Korim6078706 H K
Ashwin Kulkarni4667788 H K
Amit Kumar6076314 H K
Kimberly Lammin6029356 H K
Emad Muhammed Mallick6070767 H K
Amit Narendra Modi4251611 H E S
Asif Muhammad6093044 H K
Kemparaju Narayanasetty6028694 H K
Radhakant Pandey4276799 H K E S
Pankaj Pathak4169826 H K
Richard Power2653730 H K
Nomaan Arif Sheikh6147506 K
Anupkumar Shetty6094010 H K
Harvinder Singh6029849 H S
Robert Smith6118856 H K S
Lloyd A Spaine3113123 H K
Subash Chander Tandon3194498 K
Grahame John Saint Clair Taylor2556170 H K E S
Aamer Ullah4032739 H
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-525246
Hip Revision-8924
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement114
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement735243
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement9035
Knee Revision-8418
Elbow Primary-Fewer Than 54
Elbow Revision-Fewer Than 53
Shoulder Primary-6620
Shoulder Revision-74
           Total1607+601
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2019
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-1821717
Hip Revision-22369
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement2611
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement2358703
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement24792
Knee Revision-24952
Ankle Primary-Fewer Than 512
Elbow Primary-118
Elbow Revision-Fewer Than 54
Shoulder Primary-17454
Shoulder Revision-148
           Total5123+1730
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreWorse Than Expected20820.8222.74
EQ-5DAs Expected1860.4200.469
EQ-VASWorse Than Expected18110.6014.41
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected30481.081.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19As Expected59410.781.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected31990.691.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003, for Northern Ireland since 2013 and for the Isle of Man since 2015.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male40%40%
Under 60 years of age20%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)16%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)25%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis9%9%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem5185299%
Hip cup52401100%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man or the independent sector and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreAs Expected33716.0017.33
EQ-5DWorse Than Expected3160.3010.341
EQ-VASAs Expected3067.557.51
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for August 2009 - August 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected45410.881.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug09-Aug19Better Than Expected84690.721.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug14-Aug19As Expected45650.821.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. For Northern Ireland since 2013 and for the Isle of Man since 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male42%43%
Under 60 years of age17%17%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)28%23%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)24%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis5%3%
 
ANKLES
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time ankle replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

Note: Data submission for Northern Ireland hospitals started in February 2013 and for the Isle of Man in July 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2010 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male42%59%
Under 60 years of age33%20%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)14%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)25%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis50%12%
 
ELBOWS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time elbow replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

Note: Data submission for Northern Ireland hospitals started in February 2013 and for the Isle of Man in July 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male15%30%
Under 60 years of age33%30%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)29%32%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis100%79%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

Note: Data submission for Northern Ireland hospitals started in February 2013 and for the Isle of Man in July 2015.

Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male30%30%
Under 60 years of age11%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)32%30%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis37%45%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the “How to interpret this chart” button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)As Expected92.0%95.0%
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)Better Than Expected100.0%95.0%
ConsentBetter Than Expected96.0%90.0%
Valid NHS numberBetter Than Expected98.8%95.0%
Time taken to enter dataWorse Than Expected100 Days30 Days
 
Window
If there is no profile for an individual surgeon it is likely to be because of concerns about the accuracy of the data originally supplied to the NJR and it has, therefore, been decided not to publish this surgeon's data.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2020 NJR